<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: An Exhaustively Researched List Of Non-BCS Teams That Will Impress Come Tournament Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/03/07/an-exhaustively-researched-list-of-non-bcs-teams-that-will-impress-come-tournament-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/03/07/an-exhaustively-researched-list-of-non-bcs-teams-that-will-impress-come-tournament-time/</link>
	<description>The Unofficial Home for Real Talk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/03/07/an-exhaustively-researched-list-of-non-bcs-teams-that-will-impress-come-tournament-time/comment-page-1/#comment-554</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 23:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=250#comment-554</guid>
		<description>The point was to look at teams that I think will impress people in the Tournament - meaning meet or exceed expectations. Everyone thinks Xavier will win one game in the tournament, does everyone think they&#039;ll win three? I&#039;m not trying to say Memphis and Xavier are good, because everyone already knows that. I&#039;m saying that they&#039;re going to meet or exceed the already lofty expectations that people have for them.

And I&#039;m surprised that your definition of &quot;obvious teams&quot; includes either VAC or Davidson, both of which are on the tournament bubble if they don&#039;t win their conference tournament. And if you think being ranked in the top 25 guarantees a tourney spot for Davidson, think again. We all remember what happened to Utah State a couple years back in 2004, do we not?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The point was to look at teams that I think will impress people in the Tournament &#8211; meaning meet or exceed expectations. Everyone thinks Xavier will win one game in the tournament, does everyone think they&#8217;ll win three? I&#8217;m not trying to say Memphis and Xavier are good, because everyone already knows that. I&#8217;m saying that they&#8217;re going to meet or exceed the already lofty expectations that people have for them.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m surprised that your definition of &#8220;obvious teams&#8221; includes either VAC or Davidson, both of which are on the tournament bubble if they don&#8217;t win their conference tournament. And if you think being ranked in the top 25 guarantees a tourney spot for Davidson, think again. We all remember what happened to Utah State a couple years back in 2004, do we not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/03/07/an-exhaustively-researched-list-of-non-bcs-teams-that-will-impress-come-tournament-time/comment-page-1/#comment-553</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 22:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=250#comment-553</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, you picked six of the seven most obvious teams possible. Didn&#039;t have time to write &quot;exhaustively&quot; about Butler?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, you picked six of the seven most obvious teams possible. Didn&#8217;t have time to write &#8220;exhaustively&#8221; about Butler?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stu</title>
		<link>http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/03/07/an-exhaustively-researched-list-of-non-bcs-teams-that-will-impress-come-tournament-time/comment-page-1/#comment-552</link>
		<dc:creator>stu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:58:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=250#comment-552</guid>
		<description>No, the conference was renamed after George Mason went on the most unlikely NCAA run in my lifetime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, the conference was renamed after George Mason went on the most unlikely NCAA run in my lifetime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/03/07/an-exhaustively-researched-list-of-non-bcs-teams-that-will-impress-come-tournament-time/comment-page-1/#comment-551</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=250#comment-551</guid>
		<description>George Mason’s Conference? Umm, did you mean Colonial Athletic Association (CAA)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George Mason’s Conference? Umm, did you mean Colonial Athletic Association (CAA)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

