Comments on: Don't Sleep on the Jets http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/08/07/dont-sleep-on-the-jets/ The Unofficial Home for Real Talk Wed, 08 Feb 2012 16:38:41 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: DK http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/08/07/dont-sleep-on-the-jets/comment-page-1/#comment-1789 DK Sat, 09 Aug 2008 23:47:23 +0000 http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=757#comment-1789 Oakland No Quarterback No Recievers No O-line No chance Oakland

No Quarterback
No Recievers
No O-line

No chance

]]> By: Pennycook http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/08/07/dont-sleep-on-the-jets/comment-page-1/#comment-1787 Pennycook Thu, 07 Aug 2008 23:19:18 +0000 http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=757#comment-1787 Not as high as #28. Look at the size of those hands Not as high as #28. Look at the size of those hands

]]> By: Blake Murphy http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/08/07/dont-sleep-on-the-jets/comment-page-1/#comment-1790 Blake Murphy Thu, 07 Aug 2008 22:14:43 +0000 http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=757#comment-1790 Whatever, Jets still could be alright, they're just no longer a sleeper. By the way, how far up draft charts did that trade shoot 'Y2J' Jericho Cotchery? Whatever, Jets still could be alright, they’re just no longer a sleeper.

By the way, how far up draft charts did that trade shoot ‘Y2J’ Jericho Cotchery?

]]> By: Stu P S http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/08/07/dont-sleep-on-the-jets/comment-page-1/#comment-1788 Stu P S Thu, 07 Aug 2008 21:48:04 +0000 http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=757#comment-1788 Can't believe I wrote this and then the Jets traded for Favre...At least I look kind of like an Oracle with my assesment of their QB situation though. Can’t believe I wrote this and then the Jets traded for Favre…At least I look kind of like an Oracle with my assesment of their QB situation though.

]]> By: Pennycook http://theondeckcircle.net/2008/08/07/dont-sleep-on-the-jets/comment-page-1/#comment-1791 Pennycook Thu, 07 Aug 2008 14:23:33 +0000 http://theondeckcircle.wordpress.com/?p=757#comment-1791 You'd have to be a complete fool to sleep on the Raiders this year. Of their first 12 games only ONE is against a team that finished .500 or better last year (a home game against the Chargers). Easy schedule + stellar D + rookie sensations on O = 10 wins for sure. You’d have to be a complete fool to sleep on the Raiders this year. Of their first 12 games only ONE is against a team that finished .500 or better last year (a home game against the Chargers). Easy schedule + stellar D + rookie sensations on O = 10 wins for sure.

]]>