“Why don’t you quit making blogs, try and make some money?” - Fabolous
“Yup, I’m back stuntin!” – Fabolous
Fabolous sent me home and brought me back. This makes no sense. What an awful way to return to writing. Whatever.
Anyway…
A great deal has been made around Blue Jay Nation of late as to what lineup changes are coming when “E5” Edwin Encarnacion returns from the disabled list (in roughly two weeks time). The crux of the confusion is that Jose Bautista has filled in admirably at third base, Travis Snider has been swinging a hot bat, Fred Lewis has been an absolute revelation since he was plucked from San Fran, and there may not be enough at bats to go around when Encarnacion returns.
Cito Gaston has said E5 will resume the starting third baseman’s role when he’s healthy, which certainly made Lyle Overbay’s hamstrings cringe. Cito’s plan, then, will either see Lewis head to the bench or see Lewis and Bautista platoon in the outfield with Snider bouncing between left and right. I am giving Cito the benefit of the doubt that this will not, in any way, limit Snider’s at bats, but Cito has done more questionable things in the (recent) past.
Cito’s logic was that E5’s hefty contract ($4.75M) is a big reason to find him playing time. I don’t really buy that logic, as it’s an expiring contract and I don’t believe Encarnacion is a part of the term’s long-term plans. Thus, you may want to get him hot to increase his trade value, but if you’re holding on to him for the year, the cost is essentially sunk at this point…if it’s a waste of money, fine, but don’t cost the team wins in addition.
Bautista makes $2.4M and Lewis makes just $455,00, so if money is your logic, Lewis heads to the bench, without a doubt. But is this the right move?
Not only has MNF Lewis been on a tear since his arrival (.831 OPS), but he has also endeared himself to the millions thousands hundreds of Jays fans left. He is an exciting player with some OBP/speed upside and he could play his way into future plans as a third or fourth outfielder, so why not give him a chance to shine?
In addition, despite the unsightly batting average, The Animal Bautista has been crushing the ball to the tune of career-highs in SLG (.458) and OPS (.781). Small sample size alert, but he’s also posting a ludicrous 1.268 OPS with men on base.
The chart below shows the split lines and some other metrics for the three players in question. You can tell for yourself that Lewis is most deserving of playing time based on his current body of work, followed by Bautista. They are all close enough that the team will obviously want to work all three of them into the lineup whenever possible (essentially letting them fight it out for playing time, and possibly a future roster spot). I used projected final stats as a way of limiting the room for sample size error for Encarnacion (and rest assured, the preseason projections weren’t far from what you see below).
The best solution is likely a timeshare with some platoon splits coming into play. Try to factor in E5’s 10 errors in 51 games as a Jay as well, since it’s too early in the year to use UZR.
Bautista: .823 OPS vLH, .695 OPS vRH (career)
Lewis: .695 OPS vLH, .800 OPS vRH (career)
Encarnacion: .835 OPS vLH, .769 OPS vRH (career)
It will certainly be interesting to see how Cito splits up the playing time. It seems obvious that The Animal should play against lefties and sit against righties, but it seems to be Cito’s unstated goal to get Bautista 700 plate appearances this year.
I’d probably put Lewis and Bautista in a straight-platoon in the outfield, while also letting Bautista spell E5 at third once or twice a week.
Oh, and Mike McCoy is getting sent down to make room for E5, almost for certain…he’s hardly seen the field since Aaron Hill’s return, and while this is unfortunate, he’s the most expendable on the roster right now.
#1 by Samuel on May 14th, 2010
| Quote
Welcome back Blake.
I don’t see Bautista maintaining regular playing time with that average and an OPS that is unsustainable, in my opinion. I think you hit the nail on the head with the small sample size alert: hit a few lucky homers and OPS gets inflated.
My biggest question is what happens to the starting rotation in the coming months. Assuming the best — assuming no injuries — you’re gonna have guys returning from injury and guys (Drabek, Mills) that could use some big league experience. What happens to Morrow and Eveland? Do they still have the upside to warrant a rotation spot or do they get squeezed out? Morrow is superb in MLB: The Show ‘10, so it would be a shame to waste that talent.
#2 by Blake Murphy on May 14th, 2010
| Quote
The problem with your Bautista logic is that it requires Cito Gaston to see it…look at the quotables he’s put forth…the guy confuses Bautista with Pujols somehow.
The starting rotation question is a bigger one I’ll probably tackle next week…I wanted an “easy” topic to get my writing flow back…the rotation one will take some time. Early thoughts - Drabek’s control won’t allow him to push for a spot until mid-summer at the earliest, and Eveland is definitely ticketed to get DFAd. Oh, and I quit if Tallet returns to the rotation over Morrow/Zip-chin-ski/Mills/Litsch/etc.